Jump to content

RG 65

Want to know about RG65, look in here

50 topics in this forum

  1. RG65 Website

    • 0 replies
    • 3,917 views
  2. National France 2020

    • 0 replies
    • 499 views
  3. Traveller 8 - Datchet Water

    • 1 reply
    • 801 views
    • 0 replies
    • 980 views
    • 0 replies
    • 559 views
    • 0 replies
    • 411 views
    • 0 replies
    • 419 views
    • 0 replies
    • 504 views
  4. Birkenhead Series

    • 0 replies
    • 721 views
    • 1 reply
    • 711 views
    • 0 replies
    • 796 views
    • 1 reply
    • 925 views
    • 0 replies
    • 974 views
    • 0 replies
    • 718 views
    • 0 replies
    • 733 views
    • 0 replies
    • 986 views
    • 0 replies
    • 805 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1,224 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1,163 views
    • 0 replies
    • 965 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1,458 views
    • 4 replies
    • 1,918 views
    • 3 replies
    • 1,625 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1,765 views
  5. 2016 Natonals Video

    • 0 replies
    • 1,088 views
  6. Fonix action photos

    • 0 replies
    • 1,075 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1,213 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1,107 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1,528 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1,117 views


  • Recent Topics

  • Recent Posts

    • The comprehensive analysis by Roger Stollery would be a useful and helpful document if only it had stuck to facts rather than conjecture and partial quotes. For example, under the heading of "Objects" Roger correctly quotes the existing constitution " To encourage and promote model yachting in all its branches" but then simply says that the new proposal "has now been dumbed down to just promote sailing". This is totally incorrect. The new proposal states " to promote the sport of radio and free sailing in the UK" Our sport is much more than just sailing, design/building/restoration etc are all parts of our sport. The Objects of the MYA have not changed . Roger makes much about the selection of Vice Presidents saying that it is currently made by nomination from 5 different clubs. No it is not! The present constitution states "Nominations for Officers, Trustees, and new Vice Presidents may be made by an affiliated club, an affiliated class association or a District committee" there is nothing about 5 clubs and there is no fundamental change here in the new proposal. Apparently the EGM is only supposed to be for minor changes ? Really? an EGM is exactly the place for constitutional change to take place rather than at an AGM which already has a busy agenda. Major constitutional change should always be undertaken in a stand alone meeting. Unfortunately the wording of the present constitution prevents discussion and amendments at an EGM this is corrected in the new proposals where the procedures for an EGM correctly permit the same opportunities for discussion and amendment as at an AGM It is unfortunate that at least one club secretary has already repeated these untruths to his club members in a bid to "inform " them of changes without checking his facts first. By all means do your analysis, make your criticisms, or better still, your suggestions for improvement, but do try and stick to the facts.
    • Hi Could anyone suggest a source of stick on numbers so I can neatly put GBR**** on my hull, please? At a sensible price I might add!
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      974
    • Total Posts
      5,132
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      412
    • Most Online
      294

    Newest Member
    Howard Ogden
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...